Monday, 23 March 2015

Anthropomorphism and the Cute

One of the first comic strips I ever made detailed the friendship between a hay-bale called Hera and a raindrop called Regina. I’m almost certain the idea came from me picking the first two things I saw looking out of my window, but I have come to the conclusion that it was also to do with the fact that it is far easier to draw both a block and a tear drop shape with arms and legs than anatomically correct human beings. For this project however, I have created an anthropomorphised racoon inspired by my course tutor, Andrew.

This example of anthropomorphism would be classed as ‘animalistic animal’ on the ‘Sliding Scale of Anthropomorphism’,[1] although I would personally think it more of an animal/human hybrid where a human head has been fused to an animal body. This image may be used as a caricature or to comment on the character of the person in a social satire, maybe implying they are sneaky, or a thief; a tool which is popular in political satire.
 
Andrew Racoon number one- an 'Animalistic Animal'


 By using certain animals an artist can communicate to the audience certain physical traits or personality traits of a politician or celebrity, as we can see in this illustration where Steve Bell has portrayed Ed Milliband as a giant panda.
Copyright Steve Bell


This was a comment on both the fact that the Edinburgh Zoo panda was unable to conceive and that maybe the Labour leader Ed Milliband is also not particularly inspiring and is unable to conceive any ideas. By portraying him as a panda Bell is also commenting on the fact that pandas are not particularly pro-active creatures, or maybe that in a world where politicians are bears, an animal that is usually feared and are known for being bloody thirsty, compared to them Milliband is seen as less as a threat and is instead branded as the cuddliest and laziest of the bear species.

If I were to create an anthropomorphised character that would be more at home in a narrative text or a children’s book, I would take more care with the design of his body frame and stance. The following image focuses much more on the more human aspect and would be at the other end of the scale at “Borderline Little Bit Beastly’[2]. Instead of completely ‘Little Bit Beastly’[3] where an animal head has been plonked on a human body (in other words the complete opposite of the first image) with little reference to fur or biologically correct feet and paws, my Andrew Raccoon has raccoon ears, tail and feet. The hands are fairly human as they are holding a poster exactly as a human would, however raccoons are known to handle items in a very humanoid way anwyay.  However, like the previous image, although stylised it still holds onto some realism.
Andrew Raccoon number two- 'Borderline Little Bit Beastly'

Maybe he would be stylized even further if I were to use him as a character in a cartoon strip or graphic novel. Here he is more of a funny animal[4], a Donald duck type character where he can walk and talk like a human but still has his ears and tail. The face, which was once a bearded man, has now been simplified completely to a cloud shape, which can now be either seen as facial hair or bushy fur. His once clawed feet are now completely flat on the ground like a humans’, and are encased in shoes, implying that his bodily structure is now completely humanoid.

Andrew Raccoon number 3- 'Funny Animal'



 To stretch this image even further from reality and into the realm of the ‘cute’ we almost go full circle and back to animalistic animal, even if that only means that he is no longer wearing clothes. His body shape is now no longer the shape of a raccoon, but isn’t really humanoid either. Much like Hello Kitty or Dick Brunas ‘Miffy’, the illustration has the stereotypically cute disproportionally large head and friendly disposition. 

Andrew Raccoon number 4- 'Funny Animal' with bonus cuteness



References:

1.TV TROPES, 2010
2.TV TROPES, 2010
3.TV TROPES, 2010
4.TV TROPES, 2010

Bibliography

TV TROPES. 2010. Sliding Scale of Anthropomorphism. [Online]. [Accessed 9 March 2015]. Available from:





No comments:

Post a Comment